data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bc3a4/bc3a4f620332fe3e7a4301401c25ed2d0be7eb77" alt="Mikrotik routeros vs ubiquiti edgeos"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/76ee4/76ee416c01f32c59217cd222f5e504c7230ae1bf" alt="mikrotik routeros vs ubiquiti edgeos mikrotik routeros vs ubiquiti edgeos"
UBNT are releasing their EdgemaxPro series, witch will probably will kick ass of MT by $ per packet per second. Mikrotik has large community and WIKI is stuffed with useful examples how to achieve complex tasks to avoid unexpected downtime for 2500 customers, CCR is connected to GSM resetter, in case if it will crash, it can be rebooted by SMS Mikrotik have CCR routers, they are performing great, there was DDoS attack targeted to my customers network, CCR12G CPU where running at 80%, but did not crashed.ĭissapintment is New CCR SFP+, we put one in production around month ago, it crashed twice since then. In the more crowded towns, all gear is changed to UBNT, because of unstability of mikrotik. In the country side where is less interference, my client is using Airmax sector antennas paired with RB912, and SXT-HP for customers, allowing distance around 15km from sector with reasonable performance. I tried 9.8km, but Ireland is too rainy for that distance, longes one 6k, never dropped connection, once with realy heavy rain latency increased to 200ms for about 2min. UBNT has airfiber, witch is amazing, until now I have setup 4 links for my client, all of them are in range 4-6km, full speed on all of them. of course you can use parabolic antenna with mikrotik, but again cost.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f3c58/f3c5830f821d51d126460363648bb6635f935082" alt="mikrotik routeros vs ubiquiti edgeos mikrotik routeros vs ubiquiti edgeos"
I am quite sure the reason is good antenna design, as parabolic antenna is not picking up interference from the back. UBNT is more stable in noisy enviroment, where mikrotik devices are reconnecting constantly,Īlso in noisy enviroment ubnt has better performace. UBNT has better desigh for mid range antennas, I can't wait for integrated parabolic antennas from mikrotik like nanobridge I love Router OS flexibility! The prices for MT SXT-lite are incredible low now. There is no way to say witch one is better? Each of them are making some unique products. Had to this day, with Mikrotik's wireless offering ? That is beginning to nibble away at the confidence, I have Preference because the Ubiquiti config interface is moreĭoes anyone have a technical opinion or experience toĬontribute that might help clear the mounting confusion Or is it simply, as it is with Macintosh users, an affective So is this Mikrotik vs Ubiquiti wireless issue myth or reality ? Personally I like Mikrotik, but it isn't about what I like is it ?įor me it has to be about what's going to work best for my client Requested a price for an RB & antenna combo. I opt for a Ubiquiti device instead, even though I had explicitly While Mikrotik is excellent at what it does best: routers.Ĭase in point: this morning a supplier responded by suggesting Telling me that Ubiquiti is better suited wireless needs Mainly as APs, routers and hotspot devices, and up tillįor the past year and a half I have heard various people I have been working with RBs for about two years now.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bc3a4/bc3a4f620332fe3e7a4301401c25ed2d0be7eb77" alt="Mikrotik routeros vs ubiquiti edgeos"